Opiniones de GitLab

Gestion de proyectos y codigo

Puntos a favor:

Muy facil de organizar, permite subgrupos

Puntos en contra:

Version en continuo cambio, equipos limitados a 5 personas

Exelente alternativa a Github

Puntos a favor:

Lo que más me gusta de Gitlab es que puedo crear un servidor privado y así me aseguro de tener el control de mis datos.

Puntos en contra:

En general todo está bien con GitLab, pero si tengo que mencionar algo sería la de optimizar las imágenes Docker para que no demanden muchos recursos.

Para mi el rey de todas las plataformas de DevOps

Puntos a favor:

Lo uso a diario desde que empecé mi carrera profesional. Gran facilidad de uso, creación de tickets y de progresos, ramas...

Puntos en contra:

Al principio, si nunca has utilizado una herramienta de este tipo puede ser un poco complicado hasta que te haces a ella, la implementas en otros softwares...

The Comprehensive Solution for Collaborative Software Development

Comentarios: GitLab provides a comprehensive solution for source code management, continuous integration and deployment, issue tracking, and collaboration. This integrated approach eliminates the need for multiple tools and reduces complexity, saving time and resources. Additionally, GitLab's advanced features, such as automated testing and code review, enhance code quality and accelerate release cycles. Overall, GitLab's benefits include improved team productivity, faster time-to-market, and reduced costs.

Puntos a favor:

GitLab's most impactful features are its integrated CI/CD pipeline, version control, and collaboration tools. The product has a bit of a learning curve but is generally considered easy to use. GitLab's integration with existing business processes was easy as there are many options for customization and automation. Onboarding is very easy for most developers which is why our organization has chosen it over other tools.

Puntos en contra:

We have expected better performance overall but it was sluggish at times. so that can be improved.Intuitive user interface is also very important where gitlab lags a littleRobust project management capabilities can be brought in. If there is more comprehensive documentation then it will really help lot of people in the industry

Gitlab review

Comentarios: We really like GitLab, we were able to use it for fully automated development procedure which saves us large amount of time and help us to isolate the bugs before switching to production.

Puntos a favor:

Gitlab gives us sufficient features to support source code management, user administration and Continuous integration for reasonable pricing

Puntos en contra:

There is really nothing in my mind which I specifically do not like about the GitLab but If there would be room for improvement, We would appreciate more features for CI/CD integration testing.

Beware of GitLab billing issues

Comentarios: Not long ago, I ordered some GitLab licenses since more people wanted to use it. I asked to go from 57 to 75 licenses. Instead, GitLab put the order in wrong and added 75 licenses, bringing us to 132 total. About this time, I was pulled to a critically-important project that was way behind schedule and told not to work on anything else. When I got enough breathing room to switch back, [SENSITIVE CONTENT] acted like she couldn't care less. The most I ever got was "I'll be sure to look into it" or "I'm still looking into it". The process dragged on for weeks. I had to nag her over and over again for updates until she finally told me that GitLab's billing department had decided... not to give me a refund because it had been too long. How convenient, especially after dragging out the process for so long. I complained about this, asked for a new account manager, and got what I requested. [SENSITIVE CONTENT] took my concerns to the GitLab crew again... and got told once again that not only would we not receive a refund, GitLab wasn't going to offer us any sort of compensation or credit whatsoever. We're a software company as well, and we would never treat loyal customers this way - especially not our power users. I've built my DevOps career around GitLab and encouraged others to do the same. That GitLab could be so tone-deaf over a problem that was clearly their fault speaks volumes to how the company has changed.

Puntos a favor:

GitLab does well as an all-in-one software development platform.

Puntos en contra:

If GitLab makes a billing problem, it may refuse to rectify the problem as they did with us.

High performance at the facilities

Comentarios: Previously, I was looking for an on-premises rather than a cloud-based Git management system, and I found it. Several Linux packages are distributed, installation is easy, and it was good that I could build the environment quickly.

Puntos a favor:

It is a great largest Git hosting service. Since the system can be deployed in the local on-premises environment, we are operating it experimentally. The CI function can also be evaluated as excellent. This is the best option if local demand exists. It is good not to have large amounts of components and libraries that confuse things.

Puntos en contra:

When running a large project, the response is usually slow. However, I had no problems with it myself. I am satisfied.

GitLab one of the best code versoinnig tools

Comentarios: GitLab has a large and active community of contributors who help maintain and improve the platform

Puntos a favor:

GitLabprovides a complete end-to-end solution for software development, from source code management and version control to deployment and monitoring. This can be very convenient for teams who want to consolidate their development workflow in a single platform.

Puntos en contra:

One potential limitation is the complexity of the platform. While GitLab's comprehensive feature set can be a strength, it can also make the platform more challenging to use and configure, especially for smaller teams or organizations.

Gitlab provides a central easy to use system

Comentarios: A safe pair of hands with great functionality.

Puntos a favor:

Ease of use, clear and easy to use interface and tight integration with source code and continuous integration tools.

Puntos en contra:

Remove continuous integration functionality when not needed appears to be difficult - but this may well be a user error.

An excellent Source Code Tool

Comentarios: Quite happy with it. Coming from a very strong technical background myself, there were the usual set of core features I was expecting, and it does those well. Plus, it allows me to have a good overview of things at a higher level (since I do know the tech stuff), without having to compromise the repository in any way. In brief, suits my needs well.

Puntos a favor:

Does what one would expect from any modern code repository and does it with a great intuitive interface. This is often an overlooked requirement, which GitLab does very well. The interface is intuitive and allows the user to do their job with minimal fuss and just get on with it.

Puntos en contra:

The commercial pricing tiers can be a bit on the high side, and it can add up with many users - which can be just a bit daunting for growing organizations, but it can be handled if properly budgeted. Also, at times it can be slower than expected, but it's a fairly minor annoyance in my experience.

Centralize Your Codebase and Improve Workflow Efficiency with GitLab

Comentarios: Despite its learning curve, GitLab has been an essential tool for managing source code and collaborating with team members. The platform's versatility and powerful tools have enabled to streamline workflows. I have found GitLab to be a highly effective and reliable source control solution.

Puntos a favor:

GitLab is a powerful and versatile platform for managing source code. It provides a centralized location for storing and collaborating on code. The built-in CI/CD tools are incredibly helpful for automating testing and deployment.

Puntos en contra:

GitLab can be overwhelming at first, especially for users who are new to version control systems. The interface can be a bit clunky and confusing at times. Some advanced features require a lot of setup and configuration. The CD/CI is a bit harder to configure for a new users.

Thanks to GitLab, we are able to iterate faster and more efficiently.

Comentarios: GitLab is an open-source, code collaboration platform that enables real-time collaboration for all team members involved in a software project. Our adoption of GitLab has resulted in efficient project repository management, streamlined code merging, and faster bug tracking, which are significant benefits for our team

Puntos a favor:

The integration capabilities of GitLab with third-party software providers are incredibly beneficial to me. Additionally, I am fond of its version control feature, and the active user community is a valuable resource for resolving any challenges I encounter while using GitLab.

Puntos en contra:

Certain aspects of GitLab could benefit from a more intuitive design. Specifically, the analytics and board search features could be simplified to enhance user-friendliness.

Complete solution for version control, collaboration, devops, and deployment

Puntos a favor:

Git Lab helps me to manage version control, issue tracking, wiki and documentation, code review, CI/CD pipelines, project management, and security scanning. It easily integrate with l tools like Jira, Slack, and Kubernetes.

Puntos en contra:

GitLab is a complex tool that can be overwhelming for beginners. It has a lot of features and settings, and it may take some time to learn how to use them effectively.

Git Super powers

Comentarios: I enjoy using GitLab everyday, whether it's at work or at home. It saves me lot of time with its CI/CD and allows me to have my private projects hosted on my own servers which is a must in term of privacy.

Puntos a favor:

GitLab is an awesome tool to use everyday. It is simple and easy to install on premise. The free tier is enough for any small business / team. What really makes GitLab stands in front of the competition are its awesome CI/CD workflows. GitLab CI is incredible, you can do anything you want with it from building your sources, checking your code quality, deploying your projects... It is possible to make connections between various pipelines and have multiple repositories connected together to build your final "big" project.

Puntos en contra:

Even if GitLab is simple to use, it's a big piece of software that can sometimes become slow on the web user interface. Moreover the review system is sometimes not so easy to use compared to other competitors. Hopefully their are great browser extensions that solves this issues.

Code repositories and version tracking

Comentarios: GitLab ensures our code is safe and secure, everything is version tracked, we can easily collaborate with other colleagues and allows for a good QA environment before launch.

Puntos a favor:

GitLab allows users to easily store their code projects and files in a safe and secure environment, allowing easy collaboration amongst users. You can import repositories from other Git tools (such as GitHub) with ease, GitLab also imports any version history and accompanying branches. The ability to make certain repositories private is excellent, most similar git systems charge extra for this service.

Puntos en contra:

The user-interface, though clean and responsive, can be hard to use and master. Especially for new users, training is definitely required. The integration with interfacing tools is lacking, most systems (such as GitKraken) require a premium license to connect with GitLab. User management can be complicated, as the user interface isn't particularly clear here, and the different levels of access aren't clearly identified.

The first step to using Git on your computer is from this tool

Comentarios: I think it's good that you can use it in basically the same way as GitHub, and that you can manage it by making use of your existing knowledge. Also, I think it's nice that GitLab has unique features that are easier to use, such as a feature that changes the display of the file icon for each file extension.

Puntos a favor:

Using Git as a configuration management tool is already common sense (essential), but I think this software is the most used for remote (distributed) development. There are many cases where you install Git on each person's terminal and operate the commands, but if it is team development and you can't use an "external (public Internet) repository", it is better to set up and operate a Git repository with GitLab I think it will be the safest and standard way to use Git.

Puntos en contra:

I guess there is no choice but to get used to it, but I would like to see more visual changes and expressions (messages) when conflicts occur that are easier to understand for beginners. After all, I'd like to see them develop an interface that makes it easier to understand the concept of Git configuration in the first place.

A Comprehensive Code Management Tool

Comentarios: Overall, I have had a great experience with GitLab. It is a powerful and efficient code management tool that makes it easy to collaborate and manage code. Its user interface is easy to understand and navigate, and its features are great for any development team. The only downside is the pricing, which can be a bit expensive for smaller teams.

Puntos a favor:

GitLab is an incredibly powerful and efficient code management tool. It is incredibly user-friendly and allows for easy code collaboration between developers. Its user interface is easy to navigate and understand. Additionally, it has a wide variety of features such as code review and project management that make it a great choice for any development team.

Puntos en contra:

The only downside to GitLab is that it can be a bit overwhelming for new users. It has a lot of features, which can make it difficult to understand. Additionally, the pricing can be a bit high for smaller teams or individual developers.

One stop shop for planning, development, and operations

Comentarios: Making it easier to build quality into the software development lifecycle without sacrificing speed. Let the computers do the heavy lifting of building and testing the changes. Bake in DevOps best practices by default.

Puntos a favor:

Integration of CI/CD and Kubernetes for easily developing and running custom apps. Fantastic collaboration features like discussions, visual diffing. Some of this stuff you don't even get on desktop apps that charge big bucks. Frequent updates that inch its capability and usability forward. Good documentation. Wonderful community, welcoming atmosphere, pleasant to work with all the employees I've encountered.

Puntos en contra:

Sometimes things break. When things are broken, sometimes it can take some time to be fixed, if you're not willing or able to fix it yourself. One of the consequences of such broad scope and feature development velocity. It would be advisable to keep another copy installed separately for testing updates before applying them to the live edition, if your IT has the capacity to do so.

Gitlab

Comentarios: Satisfactory! Started out on the free plan, and as the project grew and I needed more space and developers on it we upgraded and even got more access to more tools to better streamline our DevOps processes and overall project development.

Puntos a favor:

Gitlab offers you a secure space to store and manage your git repositories, for personal use and or for your organization's development team. You can easily assign tasks to team members, and track and follow up on them with clearly laid out and categorized Kanban boards.

Puntos en contra:

Gitlab's UI and UX are quite overwhelming for a first-time user. If you are new to Gitlab and you haven't used a similar platform like Github or Bitbucket before, you will definitely need a little training to fully utilize your Gitlab space. Make sure to get through the entire onboarding tutorial to avoid feeling lost because it's all going to seem very clunky and difficult to find your way at the beginning.

Awesome Git Service

Puntos a favor:

GitLab is a great place to host git repositories - for both private and commercial use. With its pretty and intuitive design, GitLab offers a great experience to work with. Collaboration is managed in a really great way. Their pricing is also amazing: it's mostly free to use. We've had multiple private repos on GitLab for years now and haven't had any reason to upgrade to a paid plan so far.

Puntos en contra:

GitLab's customer support team is really slow at responding to support requests. However, since I'm on a free plan, that's okay and I think they probably allocate all of their support resources to their paying users - and that's totally fine.

Very solid Git server

Comentarios: Very satisfied and will consider it also for the next professional projects.

Puntos a favor:

The installation is pretty straight forward and easy. It's the only free git server solution I found that offers LFS support. We started our project without the support of Git LFS but as the project grew, we had to find a solution and transfer our repository to an LFS ready server. GitLab offered the perfect solution, allowing us to keep our existing SSH keys for authentication, existing LDAP users and transfer our existing project pretty easily. Since then, we never ran into issues and the server is running smoothly since the first day.

Puntos en contra:

The server is based on RoR so it's heavier than a simple Git Server. You need to make sure you have enough resources to get it to run properly.

Cheap source code management tool

Comentarios: Perfect choose if you need cheaper and open-source source code managing tool.

Puntos a favor:

The most important feature is source code managing tool. App provides interface for GIT client. Creating a merge request is easy and you don't need to use console, it is possible to achieve this goal also on mobile! Another most important feature is CI/CD integration. Gitlab provides its solution to do this. You can define configuration and run tasks on GitLab runner, which can be easily installed on any server.

Puntos en contra:

It provides a less functions than other software and a UI is a bit non modern.

Great Open Source Software!

Comentarios: The overall experience was good. It's highly recommended for companies who want host their code in their own infra and are ready to maintain the code hosting software itself

Puntos a favor:

I use the GitLab Community Edition (CE) and the first thing I love about it is it's Open Source! I am a believer of Open source software! In my company, we host our own instance of GitLab CE and it's been smooth. We use it for source code hosting and for CI/CD. Source code hosting has been great. CI/CD is nice too. GitLab has all the features required by a code hosting software - groups, groups within groups, repos, role based access control for members. Members can also be grouped with names - helpful to create a group for a team and add members to the group and give access to the team/group. It has forking, SSH/HTTPS git repo access, Notification/Watch repo features. It also has lots of integrations. We use slack a lot and we have integrations with slack which GitLab provides, and we have configured it to get notified for different things, starting from commit pushes to pipeline failures. We also use the GitLab pages for hosting the Wiki site for repos. It's pretty neat! The GitLab CI/CD has the concept of runners which run the CI/CD tasks/jobs. Runners have tags, and you can easily use the appropriate tag in the config to run the task in the appropriate runner. We use different runners for different things like, pushing to a Docker registry (requires special permissions), accessing a prod DB/application, running normal tasks (scripts) etc. All in all, it's quite good

Puntos en contra:

Although GitLab has lots of features. I do have some complaints about it. I hope that newer versions will make my complaints obsolete! Starting with the CI/CD, it's quite good. But it lacks some features and flexibility which we expect in the upcoming versions. Features like one CI/CD pipeline triggering another pipeline (not present in CE, not sure about Enterprise Edition) and things like grouping jobs in a stage. Also, the CI/CD UI is not very good. It has glitches, there's no auto refresh in all the UIs to show the status of a job - if it's successful or if it failed. The job UI also isn't very great, like, if the job names or stage names are big, it becomes tough to read. Also, when the job log is very big, it reloads the page when the job finishes and truncates the output of the job and makes it available for download instead. This can be good or bad, based on the use case. For us, it was mostly not a soothing experience.

The Best DevOps Platform

Comentarios: Overall, GitLab is an excellent program for freelancers. It's really simple to use, simple to administrate and offers all that users need for developing. And if users implement it in the correct way it will speed up their development effectively. Adding more to this, it provides excellent ways to manage git repositories on a centralized secure server.

Puntos a favor:

Project operation: Using GitLab provides the user with complete control over their projects. Users can easily follow up activities assigned to their respective partners. Additionally, the program gives you the advantage to have members across the borders as well, hence it is pretty useful and comes in handy when the work is beyond the borders. Easy to use: GitLab is easy to lean and very easy to use the software as it helps in creating a project by giving instructions from the beginning. The tutorial mode is extremely helpful and because of that no experience or expertise is required to exhaust all the features offered by GitLab.

Puntos en contra:

Contact Support: Although GitLab provides a good platform for its users, unfortunately, their contact section is poor. Users are unable to recover if they face any problem as the administration is limited. Administration can only be at your service if you own the premium version. Complicated: Although Gitlab is easy to learn when it comes to the menu users tend to feel as if they are lost in some sort of maze. The menu is pretty much clunky because of this some of its users are unable to use GitLab to its full potential. Additionally, the efficiency of users is reduced to a great extent when they wish to search for aspects because it consumes time and energy.

GitLab - one-stop solution for development and source control

Comentarios: I've been using Gitlab both as part of a company and as an individual. It fit both needs. You can also switch on/off some of the features and simplify the experience if you don't want to use the CI/CD for example.

Puntos a favor:

I believe this is the best Github competitor which offers more configuration flexibility in setting up your development lifecycle.

Puntos en contra:

The menus are not very UX friendly. There are lots of options when using Gitlab and sometimes is hard to find the particular section you need. It's annoying but having in mind all the good things that Gitlab offers, it's negligible.