--- description: ¿Qué piensan los usuarios de Florence eTMF? Lee las opiniones y opiniones verificadas, descubre sus características y el nivel de usabilidad, consulta los precios y conoce las ventajas y desventajas de Florence eTMF. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: Florence eTMF - Opiniones, precios y características - Capterra España 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Inicio](/) > [Software de gestión de ensayos clínicos](/directory/10035/clinical-trial-management/software) > [Florence eTMF](/software/1037953/florence-etmf) # Florence eTMF Canonical: https://www.capterra.es/software/1037953/florence-etmf Página: 1 de 2\ Siguiente: [Página siguiente](https://www.capterra.es/software/1037953/florence-etmf?page=2) > Solución de eTMF con flujos de trabajo intuitivos para gestionar estudios clínicos. > > Veredicto: 18 usuarios lo han valorado con **4.6/5**. De los mejores valorados en **Probabilidad de recomendación**. ----- ## Vista rápida ### ¿Quién usa Florence eTMF? Patrocinadores, CRO, centros de investigación, dispositivos médicos, biotecnología, sistema sanitario/hospitalario, centro médico académico ## Estadísticas y valoraciones rápidas | Métrica | Valoración | Detalles | | **En general** | **4.6/5** | 18 Opiniones | | Facilidad de uso | 4.2/5 | Basado en las opiniones generales | | Asistencia al cliente | 4.8/5 | Basado en las opiniones generales | | Relación calidad-precio | 4.5/5 | Basado en las opiniones generales | | Funcionalidades | 4.2/5 | Basado en las opiniones generales | | Porcentaje de recomendaciones | 80% | (8/10 Probabilidad de recomendación) | ## Sobre el proveedor - **Empresa**: Florence Healthcare ## Contexto comercial - **Público objetivo**: Trabajador autónomo, 2-10, 11-50, 51-200, 201-500, 501-1.000, 1.001-5.000, 5.001-10.000, 10.000+ - **Despliegue y plataformas**: Cloud, SaaS, Web - **Idiomas admitidos**: inglés - **Países disponibles**: Albania, Alemania, Andorra, Argentina, Australia, Austria, Bielorrusia, Bosnia y Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Bélgica, Camboya, Camerún, Canadá, Chile, China, Chipre, Costa Rica, Curazao, Dinamarca, Dominica y 50 más ## Funcionalidades - Conforme con HIPAA - Conformidad con 21 CFR Parte 11 - Gestión de documentos - Gestión de flujos de trabajo - Importación y exportación de datos ## Opciones de asistencia - E-mail/Help Desk - Preguntas frecuentes/foro - Base de conocimientos ## Categoría - [Software de gestión de ensayos clínicos](https://www.capterra.es/directory/10035/clinical-trial-management/software) ## Alternativas 1. [Florence eBinders](https://www.capterra.es/software/200364/florence-ebinders) — 4.5/5 (83 reviews) 2. [Castor EDC](https://www.capterra.es/software/143532/castor-edc) — 4.7/5 (204 reviews) 3. [ShareCRF](https://www.capterra.es/software/1031214/sharecrf) — 4.8/5 (44 reviews) 4. [Florence SiteLink](https://www.capterra.es/software/1037074/sitelink) — 4.8/5 (6 reviews) 5. [Researchmanager – Clinical Research Suite](https://www.capterra.es/software/192454/research-manager) — 4.2/5 (112 reviews) ## Opiniones ### "Fantastic eTMF\!" — 5.0/5 > **Sedalia** | *10 de febrero de 2023* | Hospital y atención sanitaria | Valoración de la recomendación: 10.0/10 > > **Puntos a favor**: Florence has incredibly user-friendly software. > > **Desventajas**: I would like slightly more control on timeline in the implementation phase. ----- ### "Early user's appreciative review" — 5.0/5 > **Melissa** | *13 de febrero de 2023* | Dispositivos médicos | Valoración de la recomendación: 10.0/10 > > **Puntos a favor**: It has been easy to use Florence, especially once the binders are set up and the roles are established. It has been great for getting signatures from sites, and easily maintaining our TMF and site eISFs. It is so nice to have all the documents in a softare that is easy to navigate, and is constantly improving/ adding new features to make it user friendly. > > **Desventajas**: The set up does take time, but there is a learning curve for everything. Especially systems as customizeable as Florence. The delegation of authority log feature has not worked as smoothly as I anticipated, given how many changes to study staff and site PIs that there are. > > Florence has enables us to go from paper TMF, to electronic TMF- which has been fantastic. We have learned a lot about electronic systems. ----- ### "Great Potential" — 4.0/5 > **Taylor** | *16 de febrero de 2023* | Investigación | Valoración de la recomendación: 5.0/10 > > **Puntos a favor**: The email documents to the binder feature is a huge positive. Granting user access it also simple, and the ability to create digital template logs is beneficial. Also, the ability to change the title of a document if there is an error is a huge plus. I've worked in other eTMFs and to change a document name you have to make it "obsolete" and go through tons of other processes to correct it. > > **Desventajas**: There is no search function. You cannot search for a specific document if you do not know which folder it is stored in. The binder structure for my studies is complicated, so I sometimes spend 10 minutes trying to decipher where a colleague or site might have saved a specific document. Also, when moving a document, you need to select all the folders to put it in which can be a bit time consuming. ----- ### "Ease of Use and Compliance" — 4.0/5 > **Sara Tisj** | *15 de febrero de 2023* | Dispositivos médicos | Valoración de la recomendación: 8.0/10 > > **Puntos a favor**: Florence has the ability to implement a regulatory compliant trial management file system easily for both you and all your clinical sites. Implementing changes within your file structure is easy. Uploading documents and adding users are easy to complete with simple toggles of buttons and drag and drops. > > **Desventajas**: Florence still has some challenges in terms of bulk file uploading for example when a new site is onboarded and was previously on paper or transferred. Also, there is no interface to upload images or Dicoms. This is part of our TMF but we have no ability to add these to Florence. Also a CTMS would be great. > > Overall, Florence onboarding and customer service is amazing. They go above and beyond and are always supportive. Although pricing is more than average and there is some downsides overall the experience is great. ----- ### "Florence review" — 5.0/5 > **Usuario verificado** | *21 de febrero de 2023* | Biotecnología | Valoración de la recomendación: 9.0/10 > > **Puntos a favor**: The fact that documents are electronic, easily located and retrievableeasy to share with study sites, easy to collect documents and to QC > > **Desventajas**: the reporting features are only worthwhile if everyone including your ISF sites use tags and labels staff training and implementation at the sponsor has been uneven so it is of little value.the search function could use some real updating. lets make it folder specific\! > > paper TMF is a difficult endeavor - this cuts study start in half, and allows for consistent and ongoing visibility into the files so you can keep on top of things. ----- Página: 1 de 2\ Siguiente: [Página siguiente](https://www.capterra.es/software/1037953/florence-etmf?page=2) ## Enlaces - [Ver en Capterra](https://www.capterra.es/software/1037953/florence-etmf) ## Esta página se encuentra disponible en los siguientes idiomas | Local | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | ja | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pl | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | | tr | | ----- ## Datos estructurados