--- description: ¿Qué piensan los usuarios de Assembla? Lee las opiniones y opiniones verificadas, descubre sus características y el nivel de usabilidad, consulta los precios y conoce las ventajas y desventajas de Assembla. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: Assembla - Opiniones, precios y características - Capterra España 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Inicio](/) > [Herramientas de gestión de código fuente](/directory/31420/source-code-management/software) > [Assembla](/software/112631/assembla) # Assembla Canonical: https://www.capterra.es/software/112631/assembla Página: 1 de 5\ Siguiente: [Página siguiente](https://www.capterra.es/software/112631/assembla?page=2) > Control seguro de versiones y plataforma de colaboración de proyectos, con alojamiento en la nube para Subversion, Perforce y Git. > > Veredicto: 103 usuarios lo han valorado con **4.2/5**. De los mejores valorados en **Probabilidad de recomendación**. ----- ## Vista rápida ### ¿Quién usa Assembla? Equipos de creación de software. ## Estadísticas y valoraciones rápidas | Métrica | Valoración | Detalles | | **En general** | **4.2/5** | 103 Opiniones | | Facilidad de uso | 4.0/5 | Basado en las opiniones generales | | Asistencia al cliente | 3.8/5 | Basado en las opiniones generales | | Relación calidad-precio | 3.8/5 | Basado en las opiniones generales | | Funcionalidades | 4.0/5 | Basado en las opiniones generales | | Porcentaje de recomendaciones | 70% | (7/10 Probabilidad de recomendación) | ## Sobre el proveedor - **Empresa**: IDERA - **Constitución**: 2011 ## Contexto comercial - **Precio inicial**: 56,50 US$ - **Modelo de precios**: (Prueba gratuita) - **Público objetivo**: Trabajador autónomo, 2-10, 11-50, 51-200, 201-500, 501-1.000, 1.001-5.000, 5.001-10.000, 10.000+ - **Despliegue y plataformas**: Cloud, SaaS, Web, Mac (desktop), Windows (desktop), Linux (desktop) - **Idiomas admitidos**: inglés - **Países disponibles**: Afganistán, Albania, Alemania, Andorra, Angola, Anguila, Antigua y Barbuda, Arabia Saudí, Argelia, Argentina, Armenia, Aruba, Australia, Austria, Azerbaiyán, Bahamas, Bangladés, Barbados, Baréin, Belice y 208 más ## Funcionalidades - Control de versiones - Copia de seguridad y recuperación - Desarrollo colaborativo - Desarrollo personalizado - Detección de errores y problemas - Facturación - Gestión de carteras - Gestión de documentos - Gestión de flujos de trabajo - Gestión de problemas - Gestión de proyectos - Gestión de recursos - Gestión de tareas - Gestión del cambio - Herramientas de colaboración - Integración continua - Integración de repositorio de código - Permite la programación de multiples idiomas - Planificación y programación de proyectos - Registro de auditoría - Revisión de código - Seguimiento de creación de informes y proyectos - Seguimiento de errores - Seguimiento de hitos - Seguimiento de problemas - Seguimiento de progreso de tareas - Seguimiento horas/gastos - Uso compartido de archivos ## Integraciones (en total: 14) - Dropbox - Filestack - GitHub - Gmail - Google Docs - Google Drive - Jira - Meta for Business - OneDrive - Slack - TestRail - Travis CI - Trello - Zapier ## Opciones de asistencia - E-mail/Help Desk - Preguntas frecuentes/foro - Base de conocimientos - Asistencia 24/7 - Chat ## Categoría - [Herramientas de gestión de código fuente](https://www.capterra.es/directory/31420/source-code-management/software) ## Categorías relacionadas - [Herramientas de gestión de código fuente](https://www.capterra.es/directory/31420/source-code-management/software) - [Software de gestión de proyectos](https://www.capterra.es/directory/30002/project-management/software) - [Sistemas de seguimiento de errores](https://www.capterra.es/directory/30090/bug-tracking/software) ## Alternativas 1. [GitHub](https://www.capterra.es/software/129067/github) — 4.8/5 (6206 reviews) 2. [GitLab](https://www.capterra.es/software/159806/gitlab) — 4.6/5 (1227 reviews) 3. [Bitbucket](https://www.capterra.es/software/157785/bitbucket) — 4.6/5 (1350 reviews) 4. [Notepad++](https://www.capterra.es/software/185965/notepad) — 4.7/5 (2006 reviews) 5. [Jira](https://www.capterra.es/software/19319/jira) — 4.4/5 (15494 reviews) ## Opiniones ### "A one Hub solution that could work a bit faster" — 4.0/5 > **Corstiaan** | *4 de febrero de 2021* | Internet | Valoración de la recomendación: 7.0/10 > > **Puntos a favor**: It's a one-hub solution. Everything I need is within reach. Task management and planning in the card-wall of tickets are indispensable. > > **Desventajas**: Slow: Opening a page or a ticket can sometimes take seconds of looking at a blank page. When used in meeting this is really annoying. Clutter: It lacks options to clean-up. Since I work with it for 10 years I have 150 projects in my view and no way to hide old projects. New projects appear at the bottom of that list, so scrolling galore\! Yes, I could go to the project-owner and ask him to archive, but you know how that goes in large companies and I don't have rights to archive so I'm stuck with over 10 years of old projects. GIT: It could use some more optimizations, specially Merge-request handling / canceling, retaining comments etc. > > It's a solution that has it all but I would welcome an overhaul of UI and backend optimization for speed. It feels like there's a lot of ancient code in there. ----- ### "Strive to be best toolset for development organization" — 4.0/5 > **Usuario verificado** | *11 de febrero de 2020* | Tecnología y servicios de la información | Valoración de la recomendación: 6.0/10 > > **Puntos a favor**: It is a cloud based solution and can be accessed from anywhere. Support for protocols like git. It has embedded document management workflow. > > **Desventajas**: Lack of support for document search. Lack of support for wide adoption among developers. No easy way of project management, bug tracking etc. At the least the versions that we used in the past. No management reports. It serves the basic purpose of source code management with git. No clear support for command line tools and scripting for ci/cd pipelines. > > It is ok for smaller teams. It is affordable. Not much of online documentation, but most parts are intuitive. ----- ### "Slow and inconvenient" — 1.0/5 > **ximena** | *3 de febrero de 2021* | Animación | Valoración de la recomendación: 3.0/10 > > **Puntos a favor**: The Kaban and list view are convenient. Being able to add options to tickets are also good for management, and the prioritization set is good too. The way the tickets keep track of the dates and hours of every change in the ticket is really good. And the relationships you can build between tickets is good too. > > **Desventajas**: A don't like many things about this software, the main thing is that Is too hard to plan long-term using it. Also is hard to have access to quantitative reports. To keep all my information accurate and easy to access I use Airtable to organize the information I have on Assembla. Because Assembla is too slow and too hard to get reports from it. Everyone at my office does the same thing of using another tool to interpret and organize the info we have on Assembla. I think a Gantt view would help and a view more likely to excel in which you could add and edit tickets faster. It would be great if you could build features for the admins to build their own statistics and reports. And features to automate some actions on tickets. > > It has been not as good, the tool is slow and more like an old management tool. Also, the customer service is not very good. We had to report all manager for a whole week the same problem to get a follow up for the problem. For a whole week, all of our teams couldn't see the missing info on tickets, it was a waste of our time and resources. ----- ### "Assembla for SVN only" — 5.0/5 > **scott** | *6 de mayo de 2021* | Software informático | Valoración de la recomendación: 4.0/10 > > **Puntos a favor**: Reliable SVN Server, pretty fast, easy to manage > > **Desventajas**: We just use the SVN features, it's ridiculously expensive per person for SVN,. > > Other than the ridiculous cost its been extremely reliable for the past 7 years we have used it. We've had a couple short outages but they were very brief and got quick attention from their support. ----- ### "honest opinion" — 4.0/5 > **Steffano** | *13 de febrero de 2021* | Entretenimiento | Valoración de la recomendación: 5.0/10 > > **Puntos a favor**: It seems very secure, and I love the fact that you can see which files others have checked out, that's huge thing when working with a big team. > > **Desventajas**: It's super slow when you need to revert files or when you added 2k files to a submit queue and you decide not to move forward with the submit. That will take a lot of time and it's really annoying. One last thing is that is a pain in the ass for new users especially for artists to setup perforce, perforce should have automated tools to setup your workspace, like a wizard to ask you about the basics. Having to open the command to type manual commands is not intuitive. > > Even with its flaws it's a good option over git and svn, it has a nice webapp to help you keep track of the project and source files. ----- Página: 1 de 5\ Siguiente: [Página siguiente](https://www.capterra.es/software/112631/assembla?page=2) ## Enlaces - [Ver en Capterra](https://www.capterra.es/software/112631/assembla) ## Esta página se encuentra disponible en los siguientes idiomas | Local | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | ja | | | ko | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pl | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | | sv | | | tr | | ----- ## Datos estructurados