15 años ayudando a las empresas españolas
a elegir el mejor software

¿Qué es Maxio?

SaaSOptics es una solución de gestión financiera asequible para empresas de SaaS emergentes o en crecimiento y empresas de suscripción. SaaSOptics proporciona reconocimiento integral de ingresos conforme a GAAP y creación de informes, además de facturación y analíticas altamente optimizadas para rastrear métricas de suscripción clave como MRR/ARR, rotación, valor de vida del cliente y muchas más. SaaSOptics aporta madurez financiera a las empresas de suscripción emergentes con integraciones listas para usar con Quickbooks, Salesforce, Stripe y otros.

¿Quién usa Maxio?

Empresas de SaaS B2B o empresas basadas en suscripción con ingresos recurrentes anuales de hasta 100 millones de dólares que desean una manera rentable de administrar los aspectos financieros de su negocio basado en suscripciones.

Maxio Software - 1
Maxio Software - 2
Maxio Software - 3
Maxio Software - 4
Maxio Software - 5

¿Tienes dudas sobre Maxio? Compara con una alternativa popular

Maxio

Maxio

4,4 (248)
5000,00 US$
año
Versión gratuita
Prueba gratuita
81
11
4,1 (248)
4,1 (248)
4,4 (248)
VS.
Precio inicial
Opciones de precios
Funcionalidades
Integraciones
Facilidad de uso
Relación calidad-precio
Atención al cliente
6,00 US$
mes
Versión gratuita
Prueba gratuita
15
89
4,3 (18.948)
4,6 (18.948)
4,3 (18.948)
Las barras de puntuación verdes muestran el producto ganador en función de la puntuación media y el número de opiniones.

Otras alternativas interesantes a Maxio

Microsoft Excel
Funcionalidades más valoradas
Acceso sin conexión
Herramientas de colaboración
Importación y exportación de datos
Sage Intacct
Funcionalidades más valoradas
Alerta de pago duplicado
Datos en tiempo real
Extracción de datos
NetSuite
Funcionalidades más valoradas
Diagrama de cuentas
Redacción de cheques
Seguimiento de horas de proyecto
Zuora
Funcionalidades más valoradas
Historial de facturas
Portal de facturación
Procesamiento de pagos
Lendio
Funcionalidades más valoradas
Cálculo de impuestos
Facturas personalizables
Pagos móviles
Chargebee
Funcionalidades más valoradas
Pagos en línea
Procesamiento de pagos
Seguridad de datos
PayKickstart
Funcionalidades más valoradas
Gestión de afiliados
Pagos en línea
Procesamiento de pagos
GoCardless
Funcionalidades más valoradas
Facturación recurrente y suscripciones
Pagos en línea
Procesamiento de pagos
authorize.net
Funcionalidades más valoradas
Pagos en línea
Procesamiento de pagos
Seguridad de datos

Opiniones de Maxio

Evaluación media

General
4,4
Facilidad de uso
4,1
Atención al cliente
4,4
Funcionalidades
4,1
Relación calidad-precio
4,1

Opiniones por tamaño de empresa (empleados)

  • <50
  • 51-200
  • 201-1.000
  • >1.001

Encontrar opiniones por puntuación

5
54%
4
35%
3
6%
2
1%
1
4%
Raul
Raul
Asesor en Ecuador
Usuario de Linkedin verificado
Investigación, 501-1.000 empleados
Ha utilizado el software durante: 6-12 meses
Fuente de la opinión

Mi revisión de Maxio

5,0 hace 11 meses

Comentarios: En general la experiencia ha sido buena. Maxio ayuda a las empresas a gestionar su facturación y sus finanzas en sentido general. Espero que sigan implementando mejoras al producto.

Puntos a favor:

Ayuda a las empresas tanto grandes como de mediano tamaño a gestionar su facturación y sus finanzas en general.

Puntos en contra:

Algunos de los informes son confusos a la hora de configurar.

Loris
Loris
India
Usuario de Linkedin verificado
Ha utilizado el software durante: 6-12 meses
Fuente de la opinión
Fuente: GetApp

Best Till Date

5,0 hace 8 años

Comentarios: It is a great app. I can totally rely on it. Compare to other apps, it's quick, efficient, I love how easy it is to manage the funds with it! Also, it integrates really well with the other tools we use. It has quick responsive services. Must say this is great service. Very relaxing and easy.

Puntos a favor:

Chargify’s Revenant billion answer is ideal for small scale and midsize growing corporations. It offers mobile dedicated app for iPhone and for iPad device users, not like different similar tools. The client support of Chargify offers phone, on-line and mail support for users. The Revenant charge platform supports integration with Salesforce not like different similar tools. The Revenant billion answer offers yearly, quarterly and monthly charge cycles feature. Chargify doesn’t supply any mobile dedicated app for robot smartphone and pill users.

Puntos en contra:

The continual charge resolution doesn’t supply intelligent funds routing feature like different similar tools. The customer-bound mail feature of Chargify isn't extremely customizable like different similar tools.

Bob
VP-Finance en EE. UU.
Software informático, 51-200 empleados
Ha utilizado el software durante: 6-12 meses
Fuente de la opinión

Alternativas consideradas previamente:

SaaSOptics - The Perfect Fit for our Subscription Needs

5,0 hace 4 años

Comentarios: Like most start-ups, we moved from the subscription spreadsheet to the SaaSOptics platform so our initial need of having an automated system in place was solved immediately. Since then it's only gotten better. It was kind of like not realizing we had a headache until it went away. The more we use the SaaSOptics platform the more we find out it can give us, from ARR to Churn to Invoicing, to collections and more. We've also discovered that SaaSOptics as a company has a very strong commitment to customer success and that means we have access to people who really know the product and can advise us on how to achieve our goals for using the platform.

Puntos a favor:

Pretty much everything, and I'm not kidding. It's a fairly complex software to gain proficiency with but once we did we were continually amazed by the additional functionality we discovered on an almost weekly basis. The flexibility of the invoicing system, the crazy extensive reporting capabilities and integrations with our Salesforce and QBO accounts make our work experience so much better. Plus our Board loves the data coming out of the solution. The other thing I love about the software is their customer support team. Wow, they are some of the best support people I've ever encountered. Totally worth signing up for that aspect by itself.

Puntos en contra:

It is a complex system to learn and I didn't have proper expectations set going into the UAT. I was frustrated that it wasn't more intuitive but having learned how to use the software I now realize that it would've gone much better earlier if I had just committed to learning the system earlier. One good thing about this is that I can make mistakes and undo them when I do.

Bolortuya
Business Operations Manager en Canadá
Software informático, 2-10 empleados
Ha utilizado el software durante: 1-5 meses
Fuente de la opinión

Maxio review

5,0 hace 2 meses Nuevo

Comentarios: It was a good experience, the implementation team was great and really helpful.

Puntos a favor:

Maxio allows us to integrate with our other core services like QBO and Hubspot, also it better tracks our yearly and monthly reoccurring revenue.

Puntos en contra:

Since the platform is massive it is hard to learn and navigate, a steep learning curve.

Daniel
CEO en EE. UU.
Administración educativa, 2-10 empleados
Ha utilizado el software durante: Más de un año
Fuente de la opinión

Alternativas consideradas previamente:

10 months of an onboarding nightmare

1,0 hace 10 meses

Comentarios: I didn't have enough room for all of the cons:Onboarding checklist in Guide CX had items with no resources and wasn't even applicable to our business. We found it nearly impossible to get in touch with management when our implementation consultant for the first 6 months was negligent. The only way anything got done is if WE took meeting notes and emailed action items to the Maxio team. We spent 10s of hours migrating customers individually and asking them to re-submit cc details because Maxio said bulk migration was clunky and not recommended. Product catalog was built incorrectly due to negligent Maxio employee and had to be completely rebuilt. No revenue visibility for 8 months other than lump sum. SaasOptics is a nightmare and QB integration is even worse. Simple revenue report not included in our $600/month plan. Javascript required for any signup page customization. For more complicated products with multiple components or billing scenarios, testing was limited. With an API as complicated as Maxio's, we really needed a feature like Chargebee's "time machine" to ensure proper functioning. The only way to triage our clients' tech issues was by asking them to complete technical tasks beyond their understanding (screenshotting their browser console). We weren't instructed that we needed to enable 3D Secure in Braintree, which lead to a host of client issues with the public signup pages, multiple support tickets dragged out over weeks, and thousands in lost revenue.

Puntos a favor:

- The Maxio interface (excluding SaaSOptics) is clean.- Our experience was so bad that it pushed us to find another solution and we found Chargebee. They have been amazing and have accomplished in 4 weeks what took Maxio 10 months.

Puntos en contra:

- We are a small company and the onboarding process took over 10 months to complete- Our developer is a former Google dev and expressed that he has never been more frustrated with a company than he was with Chargify/Maxio. His points below:1. No Golang API.2. Their API was poorly documented and things had to be guessed.3. Everyone is enrolled in everything, just use a non-zero usage to activate. This made it impossible to indicate programmatically that there was no usage but should be a default bill, so I needed to send 1 when 0 was the usage AND I needed to remember which service the customer was using4. Time zones never did get figured out. Eventually we abandoned recording usage on the first & last day of the month5. highest-day-billed is not an available feature set, which meant yet another thing our billing integration had to take care of.6. There was little time to verify the bills before they went out. It did not appear configurable7. Consultants seemed to struggle with their own system.8. There was effectively no way to 'dry-run' without changing all the parameters for a shorter time period which then work differently. It effectively required building an unrelated system which we had no time for.9. Negative usages horror: you can't correct something day-by-dayMore below!