--- description: ¿Qué piensan los usuarios de ReqView? Lee las opiniones y opiniones verificadas, descubre sus características y el nivel de usabilidad, consulta los precios y conoce las ventajas y desventajas de ReqView. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: ReqView - Opiniones, precios y características - Capterra España 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Inicio](/) > [Herramientas de gestión de requisitos](/directory/10018/requirements-management/software) > [ReqView](/software/145388/reqview) # ReqView Canonical: https://www.capterra.es/software/145388/reqview Página: 1 de 3\ Siguiente: [Página siguiente](https://www.capterra.es/software/145388/reqview?page=2) > Herramienta de gestión de requisitos de software y sistemas para que los clientes de sectores regulados puedan cumplir con los estándares de ingeniería de sistemas. > > Veredicto: 49 usuarios lo han valorado con **4.6/5**. De los mejores valorados en **Probabilidad de recomendación**. ----- ## Vista rápida ### ¿Quién usa ReqView? Gestión de requisitos de software y sistemas para entidades que deben cumplir con requisitos. Los clientes de sectores regulados confían en ReqView para cumplir con los estándares críticos de seguridad. ## Estadísticas y valoraciones rápidas | Métrica | Valoración | Detalles | | **En general** | **4.6/5** | 49 Opiniones | | Facilidad de uso | 4.4/5 | Basado en las opiniones generales | | Asistencia al cliente | 4.9/5 | Basado en las opiniones generales | | Relación calidad-precio | 4.8/5 | Basado en las opiniones generales | | Funcionalidades | 4.1/5 | Basado en las opiniones generales | | Porcentaje de recomendaciones | 90% | (9/10 Probabilidad de recomendación) | ## Sobre el proveedor - **Empresa**: Eccam - **Constitución**: 2004 ## Contexto comercial - **Precio inicial**: 430,00 € - **Modelo de precios**: (versión gratuita disponible) (Prueba gratuita) - **Público objetivo**: Trabajador autónomo, 2-10, 11-50, 51-200, 201-500, 501-1.000, 1.001-5.000, 5.001-10.000, 10.000+ - **Despliegue y plataformas**: Cloud, SaaS, Web, Mac (desktop), Windows (desktop), Linux (desktop), Windows (local), Linux (local) - **Idiomas admitidos**: inglés - **Países disponibles**: Alemania, Australia, Brasil, Canadá, Chequia, China, Estados Unidos, India, Japón, México, Reino Unido ## Funcionalidades - Gestión de la conformidad - Gestión del cambio - Priorización ## Integraciones (en total: 11) - Apache Subversion - Bitbucket - Enterprise Architect - GitHub - GitLab - IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS - Jira - Microsoft Excel - Microsoft Word - Polarion REQUIREMENTS - Windchill ## Opciones de asistencia - E-mail/Help Desk - Preguntas frecuentes/foro - Base de conocimientos - Chat ## Categoría - [Herramientas de gestión de requisitos](https://www.capterra.es/directory/10018/requirements-management/software) ## Categorías relacionadas - [Herramientas de gestión de requisitos](https://www.capterra.es/directory/10018/requirements-management/software) - [Software de gestión informática](https://www.capterra.es/directory/10001/it-management/software) ## Alternativas 1. [reqSuite® rm](https://www.capterra.es/software/162954/reqsuite) — 4.6/5 (35 reviews) 2. [Confluence](https://www.capterra.es/software/136446/confluence) — 4.5/5 (3671 reviews) 3. [Jira](https://www.capterra.es/software/19319/jira) — 4.4/5 (15336 reviews) 4. [TraceCloud](https://www.capterra.es/software/135649/tracecloud) — 4.1/5 (67 reviews) 5. [Wrike](https://www.capterra.es/software/76113/wrike) — 4.4/5 (2936 reviews) ## Opiniones ### "Excellent tool for requirements management" — 5.0/5 > **Enrique** | *10 de octubre de 2025* | Tecnología y servicios de la información | Valoración de la recomendación: 10.0/10 > > **Puntos a favor**: The amount of features and flexibility of the configuration. For example, the templates customization fits perfectly our needs for the project. The syncrhonization with external tools like Jira, Git or Enterprise Architect. Also the great customer support. Every time I had to ask something I received a very quick and complete answer. Also the development team usually offers workarounds that you may have not thought about and is also open to feature requests. > > **Desventajas**: The learning curve. For people that never used the tool, it can be a little difficult and not very intuitive. But considering the amount of features it is understandable. > > Very useful tool that I always recommend if I start a project with a need of requirements traceability documentation. The amount of features and configuration flexibility make very easy the adaptation to different kind of projects. ----- ### "Very satisfied." — 5.0/5 > **Jordi** | *23 de julio de 2025* | Automoción | Valoración de la recomendación: 10.0/10 > > **Puntos a favor**: Usability, configurability and customer service. - > > **Desventajas**: Edition of fields. - > > I’m extremely satisfied with both the software and the customer support provided by ReqView. The tool is intuitive, reliable, and has significantly improved our requirements management workflow. It offers all the features we need in a clean, user-friendly interface. What really stands out is the customer attention—we always receive prompt, professional, and helpful responses. It’s clear that the team behind ReqView is committed to delivering a high-quality product and excellent support. Highly recommended\! ----- ### "Try ReqView\!" — 5.0/5 > **Benjamin** | *25 de agosto de 2025* | Diseño | Valoración de la recomendación: 10.0/10 > > **Puntos a favor**: Helpful to organize reqs, risks and other stuff. Straightforward setup and customizable. Good options. Great for smaller organizations that can't afford a huge IT overhead and maintenance for more complex products. > > **Desventajas**: Minimal free access for other users. Main issue is commenting. Need to be able to have a large number of users have access to leave comments. This would be really helpful. Also - simultaneous access for comments (at least leaving their own, not deleting or responding). Other small issues - slow loading and unlocking, could be easier to copy paste cells into other rows/requirements (especially tracing links). > > It has been good. They are responsive to requests, add features we ask for overtime, and it helps us collaborate. It will only get better I think. I would recommend to any small to medium org that needs a simple tracing/req/risk management systems. Massively better than Excel or other handcrafted systems. ----- ### "Lightweight and Capable Requirements Tool" — 5.0/5 > **Tolgahan** | *7 de agosto de 2025* | Aviación y aeroespacial | Valoración de la recomendación: 10.0/10 > > **Puntos a favor**: ReqView is very lightweight and fast to use. UI feels modern and fresh and very intuitive. Recently added scaling options make reading on high DPI screens very comfortable. > > **Desventajas**: No out-of box solution for traceability link coherence/baselining if the linked documents are split into multiple git repositories. > > We are using ReqView as a replacement to Doors Classic. While it is not (yet) a drop in replacement due to some missing functionality, ReqView was flexible enough to let us integrate it into our workflow. Customer support is stellar, they are very responsive, friendly and do their best to find solutions for reported issues. Dev team also seem very capable solving reported issues in a timely manner. ----- ### "Good value for money with great support but still some work to be done on the tool" — 4.0/5 > **Nazar** | *5 de marzo de 2026* | Aerolíneas/aviación | Valoración de la recomendación: 7.0/10 > > **Puntos a favor**: Very fast responses from the support team with actual helpful advices. The software is very custom and anyone can tailor it to their needs instead of trying to fit in into the existing framework. Clear roadmap of features to be introduced, the product is constantly improving. It is a good value for money, though. > > **Desventajas**: There are some features for collaboration that are missing, which prevent us from multiple people using the tool at its maximum capacity ----- Página: 1 de 3\ Siguiente: [Página siguiente](https://www.capterra.es/software/145388/reqview?page=2) ## Enlaces - [Ver en Capterra](https://www.capterra.es/software/145388/reqview) ## Esta página se encuentra disponible en los siguientes idiomas | Local | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | ja | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pl | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | | sv | | ----- ## Datos estructurados