eLabJournal

Functionality and Superb Customer Support

Comentarios: Our overall experience with eLab Journal has been exceptional. We are glad we chose to partner with them because they were definitely the right choice! They have helped us immensely and we would not have achieved a successful project outcome without them.

Puntos a favor:

Working with the team at eLab Journal to implement our LIMS and make enhancements as our laboratory has grown has been a wonderful experience. Everyone we have worked with is responsive and collaborative. The software itself has amazing functionality and provides the features we need to act as an efficient, high throughput testing laboratory.

Puntos en contra:

When we implemented the software in 2020, some of the menu items and navigation seemed disjointed and not exceptionally intuitive. eLab Journal has evolved since then and we have seen improvements. The team is also open to our feedback as system users.

eLab Journal offers a great all-in-one solution to record-keeping and sample tracking in the lab

Comentarios: So far my experience has been very good, the eLab next crew clearly is passionate about their product and continue to add new and exciting add-ons that substantially increase the value of this platform to a wide range of companies.

Puntos a favor:

eLab Journal offers some great and convenient methods for record-keeping in the lab, including experimental notes, sample cataloging, and protocol generation/application. I would say that the ability to generate ready-to-use experimental templates has been one of the biggest advantages for this platform since it can dramatically streamline end-of-day records. This also helps a great deal from the perspective of managers since incoming study notes from direct reports will look more uniform.

Puntos en contra:

I think one of the most notable functions that is lacking in eLab is a spell-check function. For record-keeping and really for any online platform, this is such a common function that it is really missed when not available. This is a really simple way to avoid entry mistakes that can cause larger disruptions downstream.

Alternativas consideradas previamente: Benchling

Razones para cambiar a eLabJournal: N/A - this was not a descision I was directly involved with

eLabjournal: a clean and simple eLN.

Comentarios: If you are looking for a clean and simple eLN: eLabjournal is a great choice, especially for start-ups like us. The customer support is really good and it is clear from the beginning what eLN can and can't do. For us, our needs changed because of growth and we needed more extra features, but otherwise we would probably still use it. eLabjournal might not be the most intuitive eLN on the market and not the most fancy looking, but if you are just looking to replace those piles of paper on your desk or your labnotebook that is falling apart and has spills everywhere: eLabjournal is a good option.

Puntos a favor:

eLabJournal is a simple and clean eLN, without any complicated features. It is like having a digital version of a labnotebook. Nothing more and nothing less. There are no distractions of features that you would never use, therefore it is relatively easy to start working with it.

Puntos en contra:

It is a simple and clean eLN, but it doesn't work intuitive and typing text in either protocols and experiments was overly complicated. We had some issues with text not being saved. The barcode printing part never worked and then they discontinued a certain type of labelprinter. With a non-functioning barcode part, the inventory management part was also useless for us.

A useful everyday tool.

Comentarios: Would never go back to a paper based system now.

Puntos a favor:

Easy to use, traceable and auditable. Helps planning, organisation and tracking of work.

Puntos en contra:

Labelling of images, gel images for example, is tricky and much easier to do in other packages and bring in the images already labelled.

Alternativas consideradas previamente: Benchling

Razones para cambiar a eLabJournal: Several others were considered, but eLAbJournal was voted as the easiest to use by the users and met our requirements.

eLab has helped manage a veritable flood of samples

Comentarios: Overall, I'm very pleased with eLab. It has greatly streamlined the tracking of sample receipt and downstream processing for thousands of samples, allowing me to set up standard procedures that even novice undergraduate students can follow without difficulty. Likewise, the pricing was very competitive and the team at eLab has been very responsive and pleasant to work with.

Puntos a favor:

This product has greatly facilitated the standardization of sample intake and inventory. Likewise, I really appreciate the ability to set up lab protocols (with version tracking) and standardized experiment templates. These features, in particular, make it easy to bring on new lab helpers in an undergraduate setting. There is no need to manage and track shared files or folders, and when a student leaves, their records and activities are preserved. The interface has generally been quite intuitive and easy to maneuver, and customer support is responsive and helpful if a user runs into problems.

Puntos en contra:

There are still a few glitchy (largely aesthetic) areas. For example, the "Lineage" button appears to multiply as one clicks on or manipulates successive sample records. This can be resolved by refreshing the page, but it is not guaranteed that you will remain on the same sample record when you refresh. This doesn't seem to impact the integrity of sample records, but can be annoying when working with a lot of sample records. There is not yet a function to create copies of plates of samples (e.g., whole-plate aliquots, series, or downstream product). One can work around this with batch importation, but I do look forward to this feature eventually being incorporated.

Alternativas consideradas previamente: Benchling

Razones para cambiar a eLabJournal: eLab offered a combined electronic lab journal and inventory tracking/management platform that was both intuitive and economical.