--- description: ¿Qué piensan los usuarios de LILT? Lee las opiniones y opiniones verificadas, descubre sus características y el nivel de usabilidad, consulta los precios y conoce las ventajas y desventajas de LILT. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: LILT - Opiniones, precios y características - Capterra España 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Inicio](/) > [Software de traducción](/directory/30934/translation-management/software) > [LILT](/software/204322/lilt) # LILT Canonical: https://www.capterra.es/software/204322/lilt Página: 1 de 5\ Siguiente: [Página siguiente](https://www.capterra.es/software/204322/lilt?page=2) > Lilt impulsa contenido de alta calidad y tiempos de devolución más rápidos con servicios y software de traducción habilitados por IA y basados en el trabajo de humanos. > > Veredicto: 85 usuarios lo han valorado con **4.4/5**. De los mejores valorados en **Probabilidad de recomendación**. ----- ## Vista rápida ### ¿Quién usa LILT? Lilt presta servicios a clientes de los sectores de tecnología empresarial y de consumo, comercio minorista y comercio electrónico, fabricación, juegos, servicios financieros, atención médica y gobierno. ## Estadísticas y valoraciones rápidas | Métrica | Valoración | Detalles | | **En general** | **4.4/5** | 85 Opiniones | | Facilidad de uso | 4.5/5 | Basado en las opiniones generales | | Asistencia al cliente | 4.2/5 | Basado en las opiniones generales | | Relación calidad-precio | 4.3/5 | Basado en las opiniones generales | | Funcionalidades | 4.3/5 | Basado en las opiniones generales | | Porcentaje de recomendaciones | 80% | (8/10 Probabilidad de recomendación) | ## Sobre el proveedor - **Empresa**: LILT ## Contexto comercial - **Público objetivo**: Trabajador autónomo, 201-500, 501-1.000, 1.001-5.000, 5.001-10.000, 10.000+ - **Despliegue y plataformas**: Cloud, SaaS, Web, Mac (desktop), Windows (desktop), Linux (local) - **Idiomas admitidos**: inglés - **Países disponibles**: Estados Unidos ## Funcionalidades - Automatización de la localización - Automatización proceso/flujo de trabajo - Gestión de documentos - Gestión de flujos de trabajo - Gestión de proyectos - Gestión terminológica - Herramientas de colaboración - Importación y exportación de datos - Portal de autoservicio - Reconocimiento de voz - Seguimiento del proyecto - Third-Party Integrations - Traducción automática - Varios idiomas ## Integraciones (en total: 28) - Adobe Commerce - Adobe Experience Manager - Box - Braze - CaptionHub - Contentful - Crowdin - Drupal - Figma - Git - GitHub - GitLab - Google Cloud - Google Drive - Helpshift … y 13 integraciones más ## Opciones de asistencia - E-mail/Help Desk - Preguntas frecuentes/foro - Base de conocimientos - Chat ## Categoría - [Software de traducción](https://www.capterra.es/directory/30934/translation-management/software) ## Categorías relacionadas - [Software de traducción](https://www.capterra.es/directory/30934/translation-management/software) - [Programas de inteligencia artificial](https://www.capterra.es/directory/30938/artificial-intelligence/software) - [Software para gestionar gobiernos](https://www.capterra.es/directory/20048/government/software) ## Alternativas 1. [Crowdin](https://www.capterra.es/software/163509/crowdin) — 4.7/5 (175 reviews) 2. [Google Translate](https://www.capterra.es/software/1013631/google-translate) — 4.5/5 (687 reviews) 3. [DeepL Pro](https://www.capterra.es/software/219412/deepl-pro) — 4.7/5 (154 reviews) 4. [Tolgee](https://www.capterra.es/software/1039225/tolgee) — 4.6/5 (95 reviews) 5. [Plytix](https://www.capterra.es/software/149113/plytix-pim) — 4.7/5 (90 reviews) ## Opiniones ### "A good concept where some things fail" — 3.0/5 > **Thomas** | *6 de abril de 2025* | Traducción y localización | Valoración de la recomendación: 10.0/10 > > **Puntos a favor**: The Contextual AI engine works really well, and the payments are allways on time. > > **Desventajas**: Project teams raffle many jobs, who is the fastes in accepting gets the Job. This creates an atmosphere of competition instead a team consciousness. > > The tool works well, the job lists are a bit unclear, the jobs change their position each time you open them. Quality of fuzzy matches is often low, so I have the impression that quality control in German is failing. Seems there is no competent linguistic instance to oversee overall quality- ----- ### "Positive experience" — 5.0/5 > **Raquel** | *4 de abril de 2025* | Traducción y localización | Valoración de la recomendación: 10.0/10 > > **Puntos a favor**: It has a very intuitive, user-friendly tool that is constantly being improved. > > **Desventajas**: I found a bit difficult to adapt from one specific interface update to the current one, especially for projects visibility > > I am always happy to work with the team and the tool, it's technically great, helpful and leverages the linguists' efforts. ----- ### "Lilt Translate is good, but claiming projects is difficult" — 3.0/5 > **Mireia** | *4 de abril de 2025* | Traducción y localización | Valoración de la recomendación: 6.0/10 > > **Puntos a favor**: The suggested translations on Lilt Translate are generally of very good quality so once you get the hang of the basic shortcuts it can be pretty fast to do a translation. > > **Desventajas**: Searching the TM is not super straight forward. Also, the claiming process is not great (perhaps the volume of work is not enough for the volume of linguists). I often miss out on projects even if I click on the email as soon as it pops into my inbox. > > The projects I managed to work on went well, but I find very odd the lack of personal communication (a PM email, a PM name, all emails for all projects are sent to the same email address in my experience). It's also very difficult to claim a job. ----- ### "Generally happy but with inconsistencies in the payment algorithm" — 4.0/5 > **Maria Victoria** | *4 de abril de 2025* | Traducción y localización | Valoración de la recomendación: 8.0/10 > > **Puntos a favor**: the AI-generated translation suggestions are always on point. It is a very powerful tool which gets translation right most of the time. It works particularly well with non-specialised texts as it is a generic language and I suppose that's where Lilt is strongest at. With medical texts, it works well too although you always have to tweak something. > > **Desventajas**: The thing I don't like at all about Lilt is the linguist stats section where you get an estimated payment amount for your time spent working on each project. It is never correct and it's overly generous. Just as an example, I have been keeping a record of my time spent on projects and according to my calculations, I had worked 7 hours on a particular project. For this same project, the Lilt platform estimated I had worked 15.56 hours resulting in a potential $210.90 payout. However, when I got the paystub, it said I had worked on it for 3.9 hours. I am not too sure how to take this as nothing corresponds to the time I have recorded. On the one hand, the system is too generous but on the other hand, the algorithm penalises you if you spend more than 30 seconds without typing or accepting segments. In medical texts, sometimes you need to do some research and that time is not counted. I don't think it is correct as the time spent researching is then reflected on the right wording choice. I believe longer times without typing should be considered, otherwise that would result in translators not researching in order not to get penalised because it's time you're not going to get paid for. I hope what I mean is clear enough. > > Generally speaking I am happy with the translation suggestions and it makes my work easier. ----- ### "A platform that has pleasantly surprised me" — 4.0/5 > **Cristina** | *4 de abril de 2025* | Traducción y localización | Valoración de la recomendación: 10.0/10 > > **Puntos a favor**: What I like most about this platform is the way the tags are automatically inserted into the translation. Also, the positioning is correct almost 100% of the time, which saves a lot of time in projects with tags. > > **Desventajas**: I think the QA function should be improved, as it gives a lot of false positives for terms in a glossary. > > Overall, my experience is very positive and I really enjoy working on the platform. ----- Página: 1 de 5\ Siguiente: [Página siguiente](https://www.capterra.es/software/204322/lilt?page=2) ## Enlaces - [Ver en Capterra](https://www.capterra.es/software/204322/lilt) ## Esta página se encuentra disponible en los siguientes idiomas | Local | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | | sv | | ----- ## Datos estructurados