FM:Systems

FM:Systems

Por FM:Systems

¿Quién usa FM:Systems?

Los clientes varían en tamaño, de medianas a pequeñas empresas a compañías Fortune 100 con presencia mundial. FM:Systems tiene una tasa de retención de clientes del 97 % y una tasa de satisfacción del cliente del 98 %.

¿Qué es FM:Systems?

Para ayudar a los equipos de las instalaciones a administrar de forma efectiva incluso las carteras de edificios más exigentes, FM:Systems creó la suite de gestión de lugar de trabajo FM:Interact. FM:Interact es un conjunto integrado de potentes herramientas de gestión de instalaciones basadas en la web que ayuda a las organizaciones a mejorar la administración del espacio, la ocupación, los activos, los traslados, el mantenimiento, los alquileres y la propiedad. Esto permite que los equipos de las instalaciones compartan información de forma segura y administren con mayor eficacia los procesos de las instalaciones que impactan a toda la organización.

Información sobre FM:Systems

FM:Systems

http://www.fmsystems.com

Fundada en 1984

Resumen de precios de FM:Systems

FM:Systems no está disponible en versión gratuita y no ofrece prueba gratis.

Versión gratuita

No

Prueba gratis

No

Implementación

En la nube, SaaS, web

Formación

En persona

En directo en línea

Seminarios web

Documentación

Asistencia

En horario ininterrumpido (atiende un representante)

Horas laborables

Funciones de FM:Systems

Gestión de arrendamientos
Gestión de la sostenibilidad
Gestión de proyectos
Gestión de recursos
Gestión del mantenimiento
Planificación de espacios
Programación de salas
Creación de planogramas
Gestión de la ocupación
Gestión del cambio
Gestión del diseño
Para comercio detallista
Para oficinas
Planificación de estantes
Planos y mapas de suelos
Reserva de espacios
Seguimiento/Análisis de uso
Control de inventario
Gestión de activos fijos
Gestión de equipos
Gestión de incidentes
Gestión de inspecciones
Gestión de pedidos de trabajo
Gestión de proveedores
Gestión de visitantes
Gestión del espacio
Mantenimiento preventivo
Para colegios
Planificación de instalaciones
Programación de salas
Propiedades comerciales
Propiedades residenciales

Opiniones de FM:Systems

Mostrando 5 de 59 opiniones

General
4,2/5
Facilidad de uso
4/5
Atención al cliente
4,4/5
Funcionalidades
4,1/5
Relación calidad-precio
4,2/5
Phil W.
Director, Global Real Estate and Facilities
Aviación y aeroespacial, 1001-5000 empleados
Ha utilizado el software durante: Más de dos años
  • Valoración global
    5/5
  • Facilidad de uso
    5/5
  • Funcionalidades
    4/5
  • Asistencia técnica
    5/5
  • Relación calidad-precio
    5/5
  • Probabilidad de recomendación
    10/10
  • Fuente de la reseña 
  • Publicado el 6/2/2018

"User friendly, powerful, well priced and great customer support!"

Comentarios: Able to easily track our real estate portfolio and run reports in real time.

Puntos a favor: - Easy and intuitive to setup, use and maintain
- Can be used out-of-the-box, no customization needed (unless you want something special)
- Well priced (no hidden cost, unlike many of the big, enterprise systems)
- Modular system, so you only pay for the modules you need
- Very responsive (and effective!) customer support
- FMS keeps adding new features
- Provides self-host and hosted options

Contras: It is only compatible with AutoCAD or their own CAD software. We use a different CAD software and so we had to spend extra $ to get a compatible CAD software.

  • Fuente de la reseña 
  • Publicado el 6/2/2018
Teresa S.
IT Account Manager
Banca, 1001-5000 empleados
Ha utilizado el software durante: Más de dos años
  • Valoración global
    5/5
  • Facilidad de uso
    5/5
  • Funcionalidades
    5/5
  • Asistencia técnica
    5/5
  • Relación calidad-precio
    5/5
  • Probabilidad de recomendación
    10/10
  • Fuente de la reseña 
  • Publicado el 7/2/2018

"Great solution for centralizing all facets of the Facilities world into a single, robust platform"

Puntos a favor: As an IT Administrator of the tool, we are able to easily configure the application to support the different Facilities processes. The general model of the tool revolves around the few key concepts of Facilities Management and everything can be built out from there (space, maintenance, real estate, etc.) allowing for customized processes while still keeping the data centralized. This allows for reporting and analysis at a detailed level (perfect for engineers, space planners, property administrators, etc.) as well as at higher levels for Facilities Managers and Executives. FM Systems, as a company, provides various tools for IT admins to manage and create in the tool including an amazing customer portal with all documentation, blogs, forums, and webinars that allow for constant learning and communication with both the company and other FM Systems users. In addition, when customer support is needed, the team is knowledgeable, friendly, and easy to contact. I also like how the user experience can be tailored to accommodate different skill sets and job descriptions. There are many functional components that most software packages would require an IT skill set to be able to execute. With FM:Interact, things like customizing a view, writing/scheduling/running reports, etc. are easy enough that, with a little training, we are able to empower the business to make the solution their own. We are also able to "turn these things off" for users that don't need them.

Contras: Our implementation is currently hosted on-premise. While the IT overhead of hosting the software is not high (especially compared to other solutions), I do want to explore the option of FM hosting to further reduce that overhead. This will allow us to take advantage of the updates faster and get the latest-and-greatest features into the business' hands.

  • Fuente de la reseña 
  • Publicado el 7/2/2018
Adam T.
CAFM Analyst - Bank of Canada
Servicios para instalaciones, 5001-10.000 empleados
Ha utilizado el software durante: Más de dos años
  • Valoración global
    3/5
  • Facilidad de uso
    2/5
  • Funcionalidades
    2/5
  • Asistencia técnica
    3/5
  • Relación calidad-precio
    1/5
  • Probabilidad de recomendación
    6/10
  • Fuente de la reseña 
  • Publicado el 24/8/2018

"FM Interact"

Comentarios: Overall, technical support is great but the cost for support is ridiculous. Support is not always willing to help with upgrades and patches.

Puntos a favor: AutoCAD Integration is seamless.
Floor Plan viewing is easy.

Contras: Reporting is difficult to set up. You almost need a coding background. They are not beginner level friendly
Tables are confusing to navigate which, Example naming of Items in A0, N0 tables and what items corespond to one another.
Lack of tutorials

  • Fuente de la reseña 
  • Publicado el 24/8/2018
Ronald K.
Sr. Occupancy Planner
Productos farmacéuticos, 10.001+ empleados
Ha utilizado el software durante: Más de dos años
  • Valoración global
    4/5
  • Facilidad de uso
    4/5
  • Funcionalidades
    3/5
  • Asistencia técnica
    5/5
  • Relación calidad-precio
    5/5
  • Probabilidad de recomendación
    7/10
  • Fuente de la reseña 
  • Publicado el 13/9/2018

"JLL Occupancy Planning"

Comentarios: Better reporting and graphic views than Archibus

Puntos a favor: Web based. Graphic views. Occupancy Zones. Scenario Planning.

Contras: 1) Scenario Planning Block & Stack needs to be able to sync (refresh) with live production data of occupied buildings during scenario planning duration. Live space assignments (New hires and departures) are not updated in the scenario, so accurate planning based upon open/occupied seats is not possible without keeping track manually in separate system. Should also be able to ONLY promote moves for actual people, and not have to include Open position seat assignments in the move planner as new hires, when the people do not exist yet?
2) Cannot move people in and out of Occupancy Zones or Locker Asset module using Move Planner Module. I believe move people in and out of Occupancy Zones using Move Planner Module (posted moves) will be coming this year. Would be great if locker assignment (associated with zone assignments) could somehow be connected to Move Planner module as option.
3) Portfolio Summary report should include vacant Occupancy (Mobile) Zone physical desk counts. This way client can get easy accurate total physical occupied and vacant desk counts of vacant (room) desks and vacant desks assigned to an Occupancy zone, without the zone ratio factored in?

  • Fuente de la reseña 
  • Publicado el 13/9/2018
James C.
Facility Manager
Seguros, 1001-5000 empleados
Ha utilizado el software durante: Más de dos años
  • Valoración global
    5/5
  • Facilidad de uso
    5/5
  • Funcionalidades
    5/5
  • Asistencia técnica
    5/5
  • Relación calidad-precio
    5/5
  • Probabilidad de recomendación
    10/10
  • Fuente de la reseña 
  • Publicado el 16/2/2018

"I have been a client for over 6 years we use it for space planning , asset management and facility "

Comentarios: Because of the ease of use we were able to role this out to a larger user group , which help decentralize some of Facility Managements work load . Move Coordinators for each department can submit move requests that just need approval from Facilities the data is all input buy the user. Seating plans are easily viewed on line and employee directories all employees to find an employees location easily .

Puntos a favor: Easy to use , can be configured to your business, ASP is reliable , you only buy the modules you need . FM Systems provides great customer support services I have had great experiences

Contras: We have been very happy with the product the new product releases have really improved usability and performance . The only con is making multiple entries is very cumbersome you can only make one change at a time. For example when entering an asset there is no copy feature when adding multiple or when editing space type you need to edit each record form. It would be nice to use a spread sheet view in addition to a form view to enter records . For large changes FM Systems support services can do batch uploads .

  • Fuente de la reseña 
  • Publicado el 16/2/2018